It is very nice. My eye stops in the middle of the left curly leg of the M.

Regards,
AS

That's great, congratulations!
For a piece of lettering to be considered an ambigram, is it enough for it to read the same both "ways", or do the shapes have to be simmetric too?

I keep thinking it would be interesting to do something which reads, ie, "MAYA" both ways, but where the shapes aren't necessarily simmetrical.

AS: Thanks!

gabrielhl: For more info about ambigrams I suggest you visit my professor's website: http://www.johnlangon.net as he invented this form of type a number of years ago.

That link should be: http://www.johnlangdon.net

David, I'm a tad bit envious that you have such a talented teacher...

oi thanks...yeah John is like a mentor to me. He definitely inspired my love for type, and now I get to work with him which is also exciting!

I think that you could use a little more space between the M and A as the join looks a little cramped. The ball terminal at the top of the M seems to conflict with the one below it, I wonder if you could do without one of them. You could also have a looser swash on the A,Y and make a more comfortable join between the verticals. Are you intending to use it in the middle of the front cover with the sub rotated?
Tim

David, this is very nice. The nice inky feeling in the M and the last A ... I wonder if the A and Y in the middle could have a tad more? For instance the crossbar in the A seems so thin, but also seems to have more opportunity in it.

I've heeded some of the comments...here are two new versions.

Top Version:
• Width of M increased
• Space between M/A combo increased

Bottom Version:
• Width of M increased
• Space between M/A combo increased
• Coat hanger terminal discarded on last 'down stroke' of M
• Slightly increased weight of 'crossbar' strokes that form the A