Typophile

Expressing yourself with nonexpressive type

david h

Proxy Magazine — Adobe vol.1 no.4:

Maybe it’s a paradox, but Lucille Tenazas doesn’t see it that way. As the principal of San Francisco’s Tenazas Design and founding chair of the graduate program in design at the California College of the Arts (formerly CCAC), she has long been known for her innovative typography. But rarely does she reach for anything but the most common classical typefaces.

“I think that the less expressive a typeface is, the more creative a designer can be with it.”

“ If you have a strong image you can use it to recontextualize the type and give it a character all its own.”

Tenazas’s award-winning work tends to do just that: juxtapose a powerful image with a meaningful arrangement
of type. By using subtle contrasts between serif and sans serif, as well as weight, she turns what’s sometimes considered bland type into powerful statements.

I believe that the test of a good designer is how well he or she deals with type,” she says.
“ Good typography should be intuitive and structural at the same time.”

AttachmentSize
design.jpg93.33 KB
design1.jpg81.4 KB
design2.jpg89.71 KB

The “design” of a typeface is only one of the many elements considered in typography.
A “good” typeface does not equal good typography, and a “bad” typeface needn’t produce bad typography. — Typography 101.

————————————————————-
Yes, I’m old, but I’m back in style!

> “I think that the less expressive a typeface is,
> the more creative a designer can be with it.”

What she really means is: “I don’t understand the real power of type, and I’m
too lazy to learn, so I’d rather just express myself the way it’s easiest for me.”

hhp

Or perhaps she does know the power of type? The laziest thing a person can do is pick a typeface from a large library and assume they are now done. The power of the type will take over and do your job for you. Not. Anyone who has labored over a typographic design can tell you that lazy is not even possible. Only lazy typographers throw there font library at a job. That is easy as hell.

ChrisL

There are indeed different types of lazy. And it’s possible she’s not lazy. But the alternatives are distinctly worse. I was being gentle.

hhp

Personally I feel ever so relieved every time a designer manages to overcome his urge to express himself through type.

ƒ

Fredo is right. The type is used to solve a communication problem brought to the designer by a client. The type should help “express” the solution to that problem, not the psyche of the designer who uses it.

ChrisL

Hrant, I don’t think she does not understand the real power of type.

“The type is used to solve a communication problem brought to the designer by a client. The type should help “express” the solution to that problem, not the psyche of the designer who uses it.”

Chris, True. See the sample of her work.

Chris Lozos articulates a fundamental principle of design—though I hear often enough that clients don’t correctly understand their own problems.

However there is too much good design of all styles—with expressive type and with neutral type, with an element of personal expression and with an anonymous style—to be dogmatic about one approach being ’best’.

For a start, the length of work is a big factor. Too much artistic expressiveness in a lengthy text will seriously detract form the content of the author. But in a poster that tries to influence the viewer at a glance, expressive approaches may well get the better solutions.

> See the sample of her work.

Are there other samples available for viewing?
The REVELATORY LANDSCAPES is sorta bland, n’est pas?

IMHO, Ilene Strizver’s horizon line is fully integrated into the typography of the book cover and not so “incidental” in feeling as Ms. Tenazas’s. I’m not knocking Tenazas’s book cover design, it just doesn’t look revelatory to me.

————————————————————-
Yes, I’m old, but I’m back in style!

Are there other samples available for viewing?

Yes. I’ll post soon.

> overcome his urge to express himself through type.

Or express himself at all, through type or anything else. But that’s a different issue. No matter how talented/skilled a designer is in a certain niche (often merely a result of arbitrary self-imposed limitations) we cannot ignore the negative implications of shunning fonts beyond a small “classic” set. Furthermore, type is the point of Typophile, so that issue is what needs the most focus here.

hhp

Is there such a thing as nonexpressive type?

> we cannot ignore the negative implications of shunning fonts beyond a small “classic” set

Is this another slam against Vignelli again, Hrant?

—————————————————————————-
Yes, I’m old, but I know a slam when I see one!

> Is there such a thing as nonexpressive type?

Stage direction:
Norbert stares into the void with no expression on his face

————————————————————-
Yes, I’m old, but I’m expressionless!

Captured from web.archive.org on 12 Oct 2008. view this capture