Introduction
Hello Typophiler's this is my P
Dear Marconi,
This is a nice project. Even with so many other typefaces with this same principles, It has somenthing that sparks from the rest.
Here are some comments/suggestions wich I guess you should consider...
1. The uppercase S seems to be falling to the right.
2. The lowercase r has a spacing problem on the right margin.
3. There are some weight problens on your figures. Clearly the 3 is much heavier than 1 or 2, and so are 4, 5, 6 and 8.
4. You uppercase M seems too wide, comparing to the entire font
5. I guess your descender must go down a little bit more... thinking in a text oriented typeface.
Just think about it.
Keep up this good work! It would be a nice family.
Go on!!
Fabio Luiz Haag
Although your vertical proportions are well balanced, the huge x-height means that:
- The font will work best for small sizes (I'd say ~8pt in this case).
- You need to pull some tricks to make more room for the descenders, specifically by making the bowls of the "g", "p" and "q" rise [slightly] above the baseline.
And a question: Could you explain the vertical distribution of the numerals?
BTW, it's best to use GIF (not JPEG) for type samples.
You can see all the artefacts especially around the white-on-orange text.
hhp
Nice work, Marconi, it's getting much better.
Good points, Fabio.
I'd add that your caps are too dark, and: U and S are wide, P is narrow and Y is too light.
There are some little weight inconsistencies over the alphabet, and finally, I think your non-alphabetical glyphs need some work.
Keep it up!
Abra
Hello Marconi, finnaly you put your font to critic and like you see you have good sujestions to you continue your work. I don't want to repeat some sujestions but I leave you some comments.
-Your lowercase (k) is strange, probably you must work this letter.
- Your figure (7) have a wrong position, alighn this figure like (5), exemple.
-Your
Captured from web.archive.org on 12 Oct 2013. view this capture