just came out with an idea who stand up for Comic Sans that judged as the world ugliest (famous) font with abundant inappropiate using.
While Comic Sans is not the world's prettiest or most perfect font, it has its uses but it should be limited to those. In a perfect world, we would have laws mandating its permitted use with enormous financial penalties for inappropriate use or perhaps even prison time.
There are certainly fonts that are far uglier which have also been used inappropriately, but that's just my opinion. There are also fonts that are technically well made and otherwise inoffensive that others consider ugly. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
In my opinion, in a perfect world, the First Amendment would be the law of the land in every nation. This would mitigate against penalties for inappropriate use of Comic Sans. Thus, the rule de gustibus non disputandum, usually translated as "there is no accounting for taste", should continue to hold.
This, of course, does not change the fact that in a perfect world, no one would be tempted to misuse Comic Sans. Maybe Microsoft would license an appropriate typeface from Comicraft to include with Windows that would replace it for the uses to which it is not suited.
Oh, wait a moment. In a perfect world, we wouldn't be using Microsoft Windows on our computers.
But I do think it's excessive to praise Helvetica as the world's "most beautiful" typeface. It is a beautiful one that nears perfection. But it's still excessive to praise Helvetica, Times Roman, Baskerville, Garamond, or even Eusebius, Centaur, or Doves in that respect. There are too many typefaces out there that are beautiful and near perfection to single out just one as standing above all the others.

Actually I don't love it, but as others have mentioned the problem is that it's used inappropriately.
I like Helvetica and use it all the time (some of my clients use it as a corporate font), but you need to be careful as it was heavily used a few decades ago and work can look dated if you're not careful, especially using the heavier weights. For heads I try to stick to lighter and/or condensed.
“Helvetica is neutral” is a myth, to be sure.
Some people doubtless think it the most beautiful. I don’t share that view, and I think those who do are a minority among typographers and even among designers in general, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Still, Helvetica’s biggest fans should be aware that plenty of other typefaces are at least as likely to win a beauty competition.
beauty is in the eye of the beholder
This is slightly off-topic, but there’s also a risk of being called “type snob” if I use Christian Schwartz’s Neue Haas Grotesk (which actually pleases me a lot more than the Linotype ver). “Like, way to go, identify yourself as having a slightly better taste than all your other Helvetica-loving mates.”
“it’s the most neutral typeface that doesn’t interfere with the conveyance of content”
Depends on the content. I agree that this is "nonsense" in one way: Helvetica isn't even a particularly good text typeface. Univers is much better for that purpose if one must use a sans-serif.
However, Helvetica Medium does get overused for signage for a reason. In that sphere, it is what people are used to, what they don't notice, what is invisible as a typeface. That, though, is clearly culturally based - a consequence of exposure to current fashions in typefaces.
The biggest problem with such comments is that they're dated. Extravagant praise of Helvetica was warranted when it first came out, as it gave the typographer something that just wasn't provided by previous sans-serif typefaces, whether of American or European origin. Today, though, its lessons have been fully assimilated by designers of sans-serif faces, and so many alternatives exist.
Captured from web.archive.org on 19 Jul 2017. view this capture