Confirming your hunch, not a font to me as well, rather a custom logo work and possibly heavily customized.
I'd probably start with Sackers Roman Heavy:
- adding an outline stroke to embolden it and to round corners
- reconstruct /O (the only real custom part of this logo to me) from /U left spurred quarter, mirroring vertically once, merging the 2 parts, mirroring horizontally, merging, done
- add a rough/grunge/eroded/vintage post-treatment: the 2 /T treatments are different meaning the lettering has been treated globally and does indicate the lettering does not come treated
No, haven't used it for years and notoriously un-accurate (potentially part of their business model). I use only WhatFontiS when I lack alternative suggestions and it has always been of a big help.
This spurred /U was the earmark and rang the bell of Sackers Roman. /S looked also very close so decided to share my thought about it.
Captured from web.archive.org on 17 Mar 2015. view this capture