No way to edit my post. Please ignore the duplicate "how to classify."
Don

I would prefer to categorize it as a 9 - exaggerated, because it doesn't fit my concept of a Clarendon or Square. It really is an odd man out in the serif world.

Of course, if measurements were made according to the very hard-to-find documentation, it may fall elsewhere.

Thanks George, I can see the logic in what you are saying about 9-exagerated as perhaps being the best of the limited choices under Panose in Fontlab.
Any thoughts about the best place to pigeonhole it in the IBM Class choices?
BTW, if anyone else cares to venture a view, on either the Panose or IBM choices, perhaps you might share it.
Don

My best shot at IBM would have to be Class 7, Subclass 15 -- Free-Form Serif, Miscellaneous. My second choice would be to use Class 7, Subclass 1 -- Free-Form Serif, No Classification.

Nothing else really fits. You could just omit the IBM classification entirely as others often do. Personally I only use Panose.

Thanks George.
Don