06.001 through 06.004 coming from Australia, Canada and the United States
— Scroll right to see backs – > 



the UPS logotype was Rand’s custom design…so it could have to do typography — at least moreso then the pick-a-font, any font -FF Dax decision. Still though, that comment, Hrant! If logotype isin’t in the “typography” realm what is? Would you save all the perfect kerning, genius font choices, and intuitive applications for your newspaper headlines instead?
won’t most of the t-shirts have to do with making a nice looking “logotype” stylin’ for typophile in any case?
no stems on Rands upright u..still the r maybe off.
yes, graphic design can happen without type — but logo(types) can hardly happen without type. last time I checked TDC annnuals, included many, many logos for awards and review…in the typographical vein.
If a logo is pure graphic design, and typography is an element or tool for graphic design you still can
“”Logo” is Greek for “word”, though it is widely used to indicate all corporate trademarks. Marks may be symbols (marks without type), lettermarks (letters form the name), logos (a word), or combination marks (symbol and logo together).” — Alex White, the elements of graphic design, p.342.
David Hamuel
It’s all well and good for us to sit around and trash the UPS logo, and I agree, as a designer I lament the decision to “update” it in the manner they did. That said, none of us were privy to the dicussions, strategy, planning, research, etc. that supported the identity change. It was a process to be sure, and one which I am very sure everyone involved took very, very seriously.
Is it good design? My gut response is no. But let’s take a minute to ask ourselves what really makes design good. Is it being pretty? Stylish? Well crafted? Relevant? Effective? Clear? Maybe, just maybe, UPS’s primary audience is not graphic designers, design historians, and so-called typophiles. Maybe this new logo WORKS for them.
That’s it. Just a little injection of perspective. Personally I use FedEx.
‘rip’ is humorously incorrect.
Hrant: so typography is only a part of logo design if you draw the type yourself? Some designers tweak every letter in a logo, even if they started with a font. Maybe derivative, but I think it’s typography (lowercase t).
The fonts I use are derivative of Roman letters … they got ‘em from the Greeks, before was the erm, phoenicians, etc. ;]
Yves — Hrant’s argument does make sense. Wearing this
shirt wouldn’t be advertising the company but drawing
attention to the old logo, which in turn draws attention
to graphic design. So if you have a problem with the
Typophile shirt focusing on graphic design — so be it. But
this shirt is not promoting UPS.
…I think your bad day is getting the better of your usual
good judgment. I hope tomorrow is better, pal. 
>…I think your bad day is getting the better of your usual
good judgment. I hope tomorrow is better, pal.
No Stephen, my bad day got the better of my funky use
of ye olde English: I confused a Dutch expression with an
English one. When we want to express that someone has
made a correct remark, we say “you hit the nail on the head”.
I did totally agree with Hrant. Sorry for the confusion.
PS I still feel like barfing after that Soprano-style
BSA bust yesterday. I wouldn’t wish it upon my worst
enemy. It even pays to tip off the competition…
Start thinking outside the bouma.
I think the UPS/RIP one is hilarious, despite the chopped u
awkwardness. The bow plus the word “remember” is great
(i.e. tying a string on your finger to remember).
Just don’t get offended when graphic designers use type to
tell a story / create a mark / make someone pause or
consider something other than glyphs and word-shapes.
It’s what graphic designers do. In fact, we deliberately
invited two graphic designers to sit on the judges panel for
that very reason.
Captured from web.archive.org on 6 Nov 2017. view this capture