I'm a loser.
-smc
OK I've got something.
I recently came across a book set in Times New Roman Gaelic. Not really one of the gems of Gaelic typography but it was once a new and exciting thing and some people even thought it was a good idea. It makes a good question anyway.
1. Who is credited with its design? (bonus for the name of the man who actually did the drawing)
2. When was it designed?
3. It was only ever used in one book. Which one?
If you come up with the answer in 2 minutes, I'm not going to be your friend anymore!
Good luck,
Matha.
Well, thanks to a vinic encounter in Rome with an overgrown Irish lout ;-) I recently started looking more closely at Gaelic type... I had met Dermot McGuinne at the Leipzig ATypI conference, but had never perused his book ("Irish Type Design") until recently. It's the proverbial pot-o'gold.
TNR Gaelic was sketched by Liam Miller, drawn in full by William Britton (in 1963), and manufactured by Monotype. The book was "An B
Erm, I think Eduardo's actually right. Though maybe it's not the same redesign you're thinking of Hrant:
"...we knew the readers identified with El Mercurio: Palatino, for headlines and text. However, we felt that a new, cleaner, better tracked version was needed. That is when we commissioned Cyrus Highsmith, of the FontBureau, to recreate a special Palatino for El Mercurio."
Okay, new rules:
13. If no one successfully answers the question within 24 hours, the person who posed the questions must a) reveal the correct answer, including sources, and b) pose a new question on a different theme.
14. The person who posed the unanswered question may be challenged at any time after revelation of what he or she considers to be the correct answer, and if found to be in error shall be barred barred from winning any of the next three questions regardless of whether he or she correctly answers them.
You know, inventing rules is way more fun than trying to answer questions.
Hrant, participants have until 7:00am tomorrow morning to come up with the correct answer.
The answer is Zocalo.
(7.5Mb) http://www.fontbureau.com/newspapers/readability.tar.gz
Page 8
--
New question:
How did Griffo die?
hhp
Yup. And those guys from Deutsche Bundespost didn't take it, stayed with Helvetica for a while and now are using Frutiger, which is almost as un-inspired a choice as Helvetica.
Congrats, Rodolfo... I should have known that was WAY to easy for cracks as you folks are ;-D.
Actually its brilliant timing, I'm off to a party, so I'm happy to not have anybody waiting for my response.
Go ahead... see ya later...
Frankly, I'm not so sure if Meta would be a much
more inspired choice than Frutiger or Helvetica. Well,
at least it was brand new then...
John, your rules don't say anything about the extra
bonus points I get for being the first to answer two
quizzes correctly.
I'll think of something and come back with a question
in a while.
Sorry, I was a bit busy here and couldn't come earlier.
Well, supposing no one will challenge my Bundespost answer,
here's a question [easy?]:
In the 19th century an English researcher, intending to
print tables of logarithms, conducted tests to determine
whether lining or lowercase figures (what's generally called
"old-style" figures) were more legible. He came to the
conclusion that lining figures were the most legible.
This result has been contradicted by later experiments,
and I'm really not sure if there's any recent conclusion to
the debate - I assume not.
In a certain way, this guy was, indirectly, responsible for
your ability to read now what I've been writing here. Who was
he and how is he important, at least emblematically, for our
mutual communication on this forum?
Right, new rules:
15. The winner of a round must provide a new question within 12 hours. If he or she fails to provide a question during this time, the privilege reverts to the winner of the previous round who must either provide a new question or ask the quizmaster (that's me, if you recall) to pose a new question or nominate someone else to do so.
16. There are no bonus points awarded for correctly answering two or more questions in a row, providing additional information relating to the answer (although this is certainly encouraged), or otherwise exceeding the minimum requirement of correctly answering the question: the honour is reward enough.
Captured from commoncrawl.org on 21 Apr 2015. original URL