hello,
anyone know the typefaces typicaly used in the US during 1944-52? (particularly for print-use)
and/or good typographic designers at this time in the US.
thanks!
Alternate Gothic
Franklin Gothic
Futura (especially bold and condensed weights)
Garamond, Baskerville, Century or Caslon (for text)
News Gothic/Trade Gothic
Brush scripts of all kinds (especially in advertising, often done by hand)
Stymie/Memphis/Beton
Poster Bodoni and Onyx
Remember, too, that it's not just the type, it's how it's used. A good reference, at least for advertising, is "All-American Ads: 40s" published by Taschen.
Bradbury Thompson art directed Mademoiselle in this post-war era. He combined modernist layouts with classical Didone types. Alexi Brodovitch (Vogue) and Paul Rand were also fond of their didones at that time.
The Onyx/Bodoni Ultra thing that Mark mentioned was peculiar to that era, and Bodoni was also used as text, and Bank Script to complete a very stiff, formal look.
Cipe Pineles art directed Seventeen magazine with the same ultra smart look. So, even though the layouts were very modern, the type was super-traditional, refined.
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jkmetz/GDH/04-17-01_4.html
If you look at books printed in that era, a significant fraction are in Linotype Baskerville (I chose the EF cut as being fairly close to the metal versions; many of the other digital versions have vastly higher stroke contrast) or Caledonia. Another display font I associate with the era is Lydian. Towards the early side of that timeframe, I believe Bernhard Gothic was quite popular.
What a bunch of experts we have here. Thank you, Raph, for mentioning Caledonia. Sheesh! In this time period, every other book was printed in Caledonia, and what wasn't, was printed in Granjon. These types are almost unknown to today's cognescenti because they did not have happy transitions either to photo or digital, but they were utter mainstays of the day. So was Electra. And Vinnie, congratulations for reading Types Best Remembered/Best Forgotten, but, as someone who has actually made a Franklin Gothic from the ATF originals, and as someone who has some experience typesetting with ITC Franklin Gothic, I have to say that ITC FG is one of the best implemented digital types there is. For overall quality and fitting, very few sans serifs come close. The design isn't really the important thing here. It's how well it works. This is one of the most functional types in the entire digital universe.
> These types are almost unknown to today's
> cognescenti because they did not have happy
> transitions either to photo or digital
I don't think that's the reason; there's a twist here that one must note: text fonts have less presence in "conscious memory" than display fonts*. Type that's easy to read (conventional, set small, etc.) is by nature harder to appreciate stylistically; laymen -the main point of our concern, hopefully- can't really tell the difference between Caledonia and Granjon and Times**, unless you hold their noses to the page and force them to notice differences. In this way, display fonts are in effect more representative of time periods (at least in the conscious realm).
* This is also probably why they last longer than display fonts.
** Also, one would think that newspaper fonts would be even more significant here than book faces - but I think both are secondary.
As for Lightline Gothic, it was designed by MFB too, right?* If so, it seems misguided to lay any kind of blame on Franklin Gothic. Plus I can't find any reference to this stuff in the "Types Best Remembered" contents list... What page is it on?
* Unless it was a pre-ATF font that Benton is now erroneously given credit for?
hhp
Benton's gothics are rarely given the credit they deserve. I consider Franklin Gothic and friends to be the first true modern sans fonts; they were a dramatic improvement over their successors. Gaze upon these scans from the 1912 ATF book in awe: 42-96pt, 5-36pt
In particular, I do not consider the fit of the ITC devival impressive. (and yes, the myfonts.com test drive does use the kern pair info from the font).
>So that is why I don't like it because Franklin Gothic was a fat boy not a whole family.
Oh, well that makes more sense. But two things: has anyone ever really analyzed all these fonts and discerned what the relationships might be? I just give as one example, News Gothic. I did a two weight multiple master for Bitstream of this, rather limited. I think it was regular to bold, and normal to narrow? Don't exactly remember. Anyway, what I noticed at once was that the type was not really a good candidate for interpolation as is easily illustrated as soon as I tried to extrapolate to lighter and heavier or wider or more condensed versions. They all looked horrible, without exception. Extrapolation revealed the extent to which the extreme masters I used were not really compatible designs. But I did not do any historical research. I just used Bitstream's masters - the whole thing had to be done in a couple of weeks. I don't remember if we did an italic. Was the News Gothic bold I used really a bold designed as a companion for NG? Or was it in reality the base weight of Franklin Gothic?
Now we come to Franklin Gothic. To what extent is that a unified, rationalized design? To what degree is it interpolable?
And that brings me to my second point about ITC FG, which is that the condensed and compressed weights are incredibly reliable and useful for tabular material where space is really at a premium. Is there anything to beat these rather late additions to the family for pure functionality?
As so often with ITC fonts, it's the name, rather than the design, that seems to get peoples' dander up. Perhaps if ITC FG had been called something else, people would have nothing but praise for it. Rather like ITC Garamond. If only it hadn't been called Garamond, it might have won endless praise as a superbly designed high x-height oldstyle. It, by the way, _has_ proven to be rationally enough configured that a successful (and strikingly functional) multiple master was made, apparently without too much compromise of the original design elements, and without too very much technical difficulty. (I think it was the first MM to use an intermediate master, which I think, again, was only used for one letter.) You could do some very nice pseudo-optical scaling with ITC Garamond -- in fact, by manipulating weight and width, you could probably come up with some variants that would be more successful than the rather bogus optical axes Adobe experimented with.
Re Martin Majoor: I read that paper with interest, but isn't it striking how much life there is in the old, irrational sans serifs - those based on AG, and those based on NG/FG/LL? They are still going strong a hundred years later, yet after only ten years, nobody ever, ever, ever wants to see Scala again even though it was a breath of the freshest air in the early 90s. Also: Scala may have been the first intentionally designed serif/sans family but Today Sans was the first after metal with different optical sizes. Absolutely the first sans superfamily. (Optical sizes, ligatures, small caps, OS figs, the lot.) Mac McGrew clearly illustrated how useful optical scaling could be in even rather crude sans serifs. Finally, isn't it rather bogus to keep on prattling on about how great it is to have unified sans/serifs in text composition? FG and Scotch have little to do with one another, yet they hold up so well. (Or am I wrong? Majoor makes an interesting case that AG is based on Walbaum, which is a cousin of Scotch; on the other hand, how close is the relation of the American Gothics to AG, obvious letters such as a and g aside?)
Finally, nobody mentioned Linotype Janson, very widely used by many publishers in those years. If you want to know what was commonly used in type in the US in those years, the answer is, the best Lino faces because it was cheaper to do Lino than Mono. So the stars were the most functional of the Lino faces which are, presumably, Caledonia, Granjon, Janson, Garamond 3 or whatever it was called, Electra - have I forgotten anything obvious? What is striking, again, is that these faces, the lingua franca of an important era, made unconvincing transitions to digital and aren't any longer widely used. The single typeface of the lot that was successfully revived was Caledonia, and that not in the Lino version, but in Time Caledonia, which Matthew Carter made for Time Magazine, where it is still used. I guess Fairfield came a little too late to be included in this list?
One more thing: Granjon included logotypes to eliminate the clumsy f, but these were very rarely used. Were such logotypes available for other of these popular Lino faces?
Finally, Granjon was the original interpolated typeface: optically interpolated by Jones (?) using Garamond on one side and Caslon on the other. It is not an authentic Garamond as Beatrice Warde claimed and a hundred thousand parrots have since chirped. This is clearly documented (and is obvious to anyone who actually looks at the type) in one of MacMurtrie's (?) books. It would seem that it remains the one truly successful interpolation of two typefaces to this day, even though with Font Chameleon, we could accomplish semi-convincing interpolations at the press of a button. Hey, does anyone have Chameleon 2? I seem to have lost my copy.
>Everything in else in display was hand rendered.
But often, as in Mademoiselle, the large type has the look of letterpress, complete with artefacts.
Perhaps a galley was printed as large as possible from metal type, blown up on a stat machine, then cleaned up a bit, but still retaining the "metal" quality (as a desirable feature)?
I almost included Caledonia in my list, but I was thinking more of typography in advertising and job printing. I would agree that it fits the era in a broader sense, along with the other Linotype book types mentioned.
BTW Bill, someone pointed out somewhere here recently that Bitstream's News Gothic is in fact Trade Gothic under an assumed name. Compare the Q's and see for yourself.
Wow, is it really true that Bitstream NG is TG? I remember asking Jim Lyles why the Q wasn't what I expected, and I forgot what he said but it didn't have anything to do with TG. Anyway, I changed the Q to what I thought it should be in my NG. Can anyone tell me what type I actually digitized? It's awfully humiliating not to know. Like I said, it was a very hurried affair. My files are in total chaos, but I seem to have found an MM in Win format I can send to anyone who wants it. What I can't find is exactly what we released, because I can't find the Bistream CD. Has anybody rigorously analyzed the differences between LLG, FG, NG, TG?
Here's the thread where it came up:
http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/30/65007.html
Bill: for God's sake get an ATF specimen book and take a close look at Benton's gothics yourself. News and Franklin gothics are closely related stylistically, but they are not two (interpolable) weights of the same basic skeleton. Trying to force that is one of the mistakes made by the ITC version, in my opinion (it comes out as a relatively narrow 'c', and wide 'a' and 's', while Benton's version is beautifully harmonious). Franklin and News both come in condensed and extra condensed forms, every bit as useful as ITC's. The normal-width gothics also harmonize well with the Alternate Gothic series, which is based on the same fundamental lettershapes but an 'o' which is two vertical stems with rounded joins at the ends, rather than an oval as in the Franklin and News Condensed.
You can get a 1934 ATF book for $10 on abebooks, but the 1912 and 1923 editions are worth the expense.
How about Venus, Excelsior, and Coronna?
Slipping in right at the end of your timeframe is Salto, probably one of the last typefaces the über-creative Klingspor foundry ever released. It was a popular display face in Germany during its day, but might not have gotten any press in the US before the digital era. (anybody know?)
The revival of the Beetle is in fact quite relevant to the field of type, especially blackletter.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3104469.stm
hhp
Stellar list, Mark. Here are some links:
Alternate Gothic / Alpin Gothic
Futura
Garamond, Baskerville, Century, Caslon
News Gothic / Trade Gothic
Stymie / Memphis / Beton
Poster Bodoni
Onyx
Metrolite, Metromedium, Metroblack
I'll add:
Rockwell
Kaufmann
Balloon
Captured from web.archive.org on 18 Feb 2015. view this capture